A crucified Messiah is an impossibility - the one hanged on the tree to die is a traitor or a blasphemer. Hanging on the cross he is accursed by God and men. Such was the priestly doctrine in the days of Jesus, as we have learned from the Dead Sea Scrolls and other early Jewish sources. Be sure to bury it that same day, because anyone who is hung on a tree is a curse of God. You must not defile the land the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance.
If that be so the talmudic reform would equalize the law and have death made instantaneous in all cases. To Adds adult bbw his good faith, Herod acccumulated the materials for the new building before the old one was taken down. Both Greek and Latin inscriptions on the temple's balustrade served as warnings to pagan visitors not to proceed under penalty of death. Dtn seems to be the ultimate argument of the Jews against the Messiahship of Jesus. The judgment also Hung in the jewish temple ibid. Mishnah Gemara. These consisted of about 1, men, or 5, to 6, souls Ezra viii.
Jamiacan models. The Destruction of the Second Temple
I can see that the Holy Spirit has been and is working in your life for God Hung in the jewish temple repentance and He is working in your life obviously for no man confesses Christ and the need for Him as their Savior unless the Holy Spirit is in him or her. International dependence model He comes. Dan Barag, represents Used vintage trailer parts Table of Shewbread. By: Sophie Dawson on April 8, at pm Reply. Leviticus mentions that the priest had to sprinkle the blood on the veil 7 times if the congregation or the priest sinned. But after 30 CE, the crimson thread never turned white again for 40 years, till the destruction of the Temple and the cessation of all Temple rituals! Its length was forty cubits, by twenty in width. The Temple Mount bears significance in Islam as it acted as a sanctuary for the Hebrew prophets and the Israelites. To reduce the enormous amount of gold that the use of massive plates would require, it is more likely that a thin gold foil may have been pressed against the stones and the edges tucked in between them. Getz hoped to eventually reach the foundation of the Second Temple. Accordingly, Hung in the jewish temple anything existed the Torah was prepared to guide him along his path through life.
In the eighteenth year B.
- The outermost area of the temple in Jerusalem was called the court of the Gentiles because it could be entered by all people.
- On the ninth and 10th of the month of Av in the year 70, the Roman legions in Jerusalem smashed through the fortress tower of Antonia into the Holy Temple and set it afire.
- I recently was asked about a reference in a book which refers to the veil of the temple being torn in two Mt ; Mk ; Lk , and notes that the veil was four inches thick.
- Edited by Lambert Dolphin from various sources.
- These successive temples stood at this location and functioned as a site of ancient Israelite and later Jewish worship.
- What were the dimensions of the Temple Veil that was torn when Jesus died on the cross?
These successive temples stood at this location and functioned as a site of ancient Israelite and later Jewish worship. Although efforts were made at partial reconstruction, it was only in BCE when Jehoash, King of Judah, in the second year of his reign invested considerable sums in reconstruction, only to have it stripped again for Sennacherib , King of Assyria c.
It was completed 23 years later, on the third day of Adar, in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the Great 12 March BCE ,  dedicated by the Jewish governor Zerubbabel. However, with a full reading of the Book of Ezra and the Book of Nehemiah , there were four edicts to build the Second Temple, which were issued by three kings.
Cyrus in BCE, which is recorded in the first chapter of Ezra. Moreover, the temple narrowly avoided being destroyed again in BCE when the Jews refused to acknowledge the deification of Alexander the Great of Macedonia. Alexander was allegedly "turned from his anger" at the last minute by astute diplomacy and flattery. Under the Ptolemies, the Jews were given many civil liberties and lived content under their rule. Antiochus wanted to Hellenize the Jews, attempting to introduce the Greek pantheon into the temple.
Moreover, a rebellion ensued and was brutally crushed, but no further action by Antiochus was taken, and when Antiochus died in BCE at Luristan , his son Seleucus IV Philopator succeeded him. However, his policies never took effect in Judea, since he was assassinated the year after his ascension.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes succeeded his older brother to the Seleucid throne and immediately adopted his father's previous policy of universal Hellenisation. The Jews rebelled again and Antiochus, in a rage, retaliated in force. Considering the previous episodes of discontent, the Jews became incensed when the religious observances of Sabbath and circumcision were officially outlawed.
When Antiochus erected a statue of Zeus in their temple and Hellenic priests began sacrificing pigs the usual sacrifice offered to the Greek gods in the Hellenic religion , their anger began to spiral. When a Greek official ordered a Jewish priest to perform a Hellenic sacrifice, the priest Mattathias killed him. In BCE, the Jews rose up en masse behind Mattathias and his five sons to fight and win their freedom from Seleucid authority. Mattathias' son Judah Maccabee , now called "The Hammer", re-dedicated the temple in BCE and the Jews celebrate this event to this day as a major part of the festival of Hanukkah.
According to folklore he was executed by having molten gold poured down his throat. When news of this reached the Jews, they revolted again, only to be put down in 43 BCE. The emperor Julian allowed to have the Temple rebuilt but the Galilee earthquake of ended all attempts ever since. The shrine has stood on the mount since CE; the al-Aqsa Mosque , from roughly the same period, also stands in the Temple courtyard.
Israel officially unified East Jerusalem , including the Temple Mount, with the rest of Jerusalem in under the Jerusalem Law , though United Nations Security Council Resolution declared the Jerusalem Law to be in violation of international law.
The Temple of Solomon or First Temple consisted of three main elements:. In the case of the last and most elaborate structure, the Herodian Temple , the structure consisted of the wider Temple precinct, the restricted Temple courts, and the Temple building itself:.
According to the Talmud , the Women's Court was to the east and the main area of the Temple to the west. An edifice contained the ulam antechamber , the hekhal the "sanctuary" , and the Holy of Holies. The sanctuary and the Holy of Holies were separated by a wall in the First Temple and by two curtains in the Second Temple.
The sanctuary contained the seven branched candlestick , the table of showbread and the Incense Altar. The main courtyard had thirteen gates. On the south side, beginning with the southwest corner, there were four gates:.
On the east side was Shaar Nikanor , between the Women's Courtyard and the main Temple Courtyard, which had two minor doorways, one on its right and one on its left. On the western wall, which was relatively unimportant, there were two gates that did not have any name. The Temple was the place where offerings described in the course of the Hebrew Bible were carried out, including daily morning and afternoon offerings and special offerings on Sabbath and Jewish holidays.
Levites recited Psalms at appropriate moments during the offerings, including the Psalm of the Day, special psalms for the new month , and other occasions, the Hallel during major Jewish holidays, and psalms for special sacrifices such as the "Psalm for the Thanksgiving Offering" Psalm As part of the daily offering, a prayer service was performed in the Temple which was used as the basis of the traditional Jewish morning service recited to this day, including well-known prayers such as the Shema , and the Priestly Blessing.
The Mishna describes it as follows:. The superintendent said to them, bless one benediction! They pronounced three benedictions with the people present: "True and firm", and the "Avodah" "Accept, Lord our God, the service of your people Israel, and the fire-offerings of Israel and their prayer receive with favor. Blessed is He who receives the service of His people Israel with favor" similar to what is today the 17th blessing of the Amidah , and the Priestly Blessing, and on the Sabbath they recited one blessing; "May He who causes His name to dwell in this House, cause to dwell among you love and brotherliness, peace and friendship" on behalf of the weekly Priestly Guard that departed.
Seder Kodashim , the fifth order, or division, of the Mishnah compiled between — CE , provides detailed descriptions and discussions of the religious laws connected with Temple service including the sacrifices , the Temple and its furnishings, as well as the priests who carried out the duties and ceremonies of its service. Tractates of the order deal with the sacrifices of animals, birds, and meal offerings , the laws of bringing a sacrifice, such as the sin offering and the guilt offering , and the laws of misappropriation of sacred property.
In addition, the order contains a description of the Second Temple tractate Middot , and a description and rules about the daily sacrifice service in the Temple tractate Tamid. In the Babylonian Talmud , all the tractates have Gemara — rabbinical commentary and analysis — for all their chapters; some chapters of Tamid, and none on Middot and Kinnim.
The Jerusalem Talmud has no Gemara on any of the tractates of Kodashim. The Talmud Yoma 9b describes traditional theological reasons for the destruction: "Why was the first Temple destroyed?
Because the three cardinal sins were rampant in society: idol worship, licentiousness, and murder… And why then was the second Temple — wherein the society was involved in Torah, commandments and acts of kindness — destroyed? Because gratuitous hatred was rampant in society. Part of the traditional Jewish morning service, the part surrounding the Shema prayer, is essentially unchanged from the daily worship service performed in the Temple. In addition, the Amidah prayer traditionally replaces the Temple's daily tamid and special-occasion Mussaf additional offerings there are separate versions for the different types of sacrifices.
They are recited during the times their corresponding offerings were performed in the Temple. The Temple is mentioned extensively in Orthodox services. Conservative Judaism retains mentions of the Temple and its restoration, but removes references to the sacrifices.
References to sacrifices on holidays are made in the past tense, and petitions for their restoration are removed. Mentions in Orthodox Jewish services include:. Three other minor fasts Tenth of Tevet , 17th of Tammuz , and Third of Tishrei , also mourn events leading to or following the destruction of the Temple.
There are also mourning practices which are observed at all times, for example, the requirement to leave part of the house unplastered. However, in Herzl's view, the Temple did not need to be built on the precise site where the old Temple stood and which is now taken up by the Muslim Al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock - very sensitive holy sites. By locating the Temple at an unspecified different Jerusalem location, the Jewish state envisioned by Herzl avoids the extreme tension over this issue experienced in the actual Israel.
Also, worship at the Temple envisioned by Herzl does not involve animal sacrifice , which was the main form of worship at the ancient Jerusalem Temple. Rather, the Temple depicted in Herzl's book is essentially just an especially big and ornate synagogue, holding the same kind of services as any other synagogue. Jesus predicts the destruction of the Second Temple Matthew and allegorically compares his body to a Temple that will be torn down and raised up again in three days.
The Temple Mount bears significance in Islam as it acted as a sanctuary for the Hebrew prophets and the Israelites. Islamic tradition says that a temple was first built on the Temple Mount by Jacob [ citation needed ] and later rebuilt by Solomon , the son of David. Secondly, during the Meccan part of his life, he reported to have been to Jerusalem by night and prayed in the Temple, as the first part of his otherworldly journey Isra and Mi'raj.
According to Palazzi, "The most authoritative Islamic sources affirm the Temples". He adds that Jerusalem is sacred to Muslims because of its prior holiness to Jews and its standing as home to the biblical prophets and kings David and Solomon, all of whom he says are sacred figures in Islam.
He claims that the Quran "expressly recognizes that Jerusalem plays the same role for Jews that Mecca has for Muslims". David Hazony has described the phenomenon as "a campaign of intellectual erasure [by Palestinian leaders, writers, and scholars] Archaeological excavations have found remnants of both the First Temple and Second Temple.
Among the artifacts of the First Temple are dozens of ritual immersion or baptismal pools in this area surrounding the Temple Mount ,  as well as a large square platform identified by architectural archaeologist Leen Ritmeyer as likely being built by king Hezekiah c.
Possible Second Temple artifacts include the Trumpeting Place inscription and the Temple Warning inscription , which are surviving pieces of the Herodian expansion of the Temple Mount. Ever since the Second Temple's destruction, a prayer for the construction of a Third Temple has been a formal and mandatory part of the thrice-daily Jewish prayer services. However, the question of whether and when to construct the Third Temple is disputed both within the Jewish community and without; groups within Judaism argue both for and against construction of a new Temple, while the expansion of Abrahamic religion since the 1st century CE has made the issue contentious within Christian and Islamic thought as well.
Furthermore, the complicated political status of Jerusalem makes reconstruction difficult, while Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock have been constructed at the traditional physical location of the Temple. In CE, the Roman emperor Julian had ordered Alypius of Antioch to rebuild the Temple as part of his campaign to strengthen non-Christian religions.
The Book of Ezekiel prophesies what would be the Third Temple, noting it as an eternal house of prayer and describing it in detail. A journalistic depiction of the controversies around the Jerusalem Temple was presented in the documentary Lost Temple by Serge Grankin. The film contains interviews with religious and academic authorities involved in the issue. German journalist Dirk-Martin Heinzelmann, featured in the film, presents the point of view of Prof.
Joseph Patrich the Hebrew University , stemming from the underground cistern mapping made by Charles William Wilson From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Main article: Solomon's Temple. Main article: Second Temple. Main articles: Korban and Ketoret. This section does not cite any sources.
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. March Learn how and when to remove this template message. Main article: Jewish services. See also: Jerusalem in Christianity. Main article: Archaeological remnants of the Jerusalem Temple. Main article: Third Temple. Israel portal. Retrieved The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. New York: Oxford University Press. Our Oriental Heritage.
New York: Simon and Schuster.
I believe this to be the case, but do not want to make this kind of statement without foundation — other than circumstantial. I thank-you Cyril for your encouraging words. Read them in the archive below. The following section contains illustrative quotes from the literature of various groups who have been involved one way or another in plans for the rebuilding of the Temple in recent decades. If you like what you're reading, you can get free daily updates through the RSS feed here.
Hung in the jewish temple. The Miracle of the "Lot"
An ordinary 10 x10 ft. Considering the measurements it is very unlikely that it could be anywhere that thick, not even 4 inches. They would have needed a very special and sophisticated weaving apparatus to make this veil. The Word does not say that this veil was woven in squares either and then sewn together.
This is perhaps not an academically researched answer, but just a common sense one. I am not a fan of Josephus, in fact rather sceptical of his sayings?
Chojnowski, Ph. Such would be quite an odd fact to make up if one were looking to skew the text in any way. Simeon ben Gamaliel the son of the Sagan. If true it would seem that there were was another available to be put up. Thank-you for your comments and quotes on the quilted form of the veil, Chuck, they certainly help make it sound feasible in the physical.
However I feel what is most important is the Spiritual meaning it implies. One thing no one used was the Bible itself! Exodus Moreover you shall make the Tabernacle with 10 Curtains of fine twined linen, and blue, and purple, and scarlet: with Cherubim not necessarily angels of cunning work you shall make them.
So 5 Curtains expanded across the room being 42 feet wide in a 30 foot space, making them wrinkled somewhat, with the other 5 exactly behind the first set, setting the same way.
Each curtain may have been about 4 inches thick making both about 8 inches thick, PLUS they were squished from 42 feet smashed up to 20 feet, and two curtains thick, it would have to make them close to feet thick. Split from top to bottom. I used Exodus to figure out from cubit 18in to feet, then you see the size of the Tabernacles.
Me blessed my friends, Messianic Rabbi Tom Barnes. I realize not many confronted this task, and only yearly, but it seems to me, to be a very difficult task at best, especially since no one else was permitted entry or even to offer assistance for fear of death. Secondly, is there any validity regarding any attachment to the High Priest, such as a cord to extract him if something went wrong. This container of some sort presents yet another difficulty for entry. I presume again, entry was through the side, or corner and not through underneath.
Once again, would protocol dictate the left of right side for entry, and would some type of burning lamp be taken along, yet another obstacle, with heavy weight pushing against you, with both hands filled? Lastly, if replacements were a standard yearly process, that would expose the inside of the Holy of Holies to people.
How could this be done, and who would do it, and were there any scriptural allowances for this to happen? I had not given a bit of thought to the potential difficulty of getting through the veil. I assume that if the high priest did have difficulty entering, other priests could stand to the side and pull the curtain to one side in order to help the high priest enter. They would not be inside the holy of holies in so doing. By: chuckbumgardner on March 22, at pm.
Sorry, I was referring to the veil being replaced as needed, due to soiling or just time deterioration, or even just being washed. This would expose the entire inside of the Holy of Holies, with no covering of the entrance. Just curious! Regards, Ken. I have heard that the priest sewed the veil up again. Is there any information on this as being true. I have heard the same thing myself and this very question arose this morning as I was studying the Word.
I gleaned a lot form each post. May the Holy Spirit bring a spirit of revelation Eph. By: Joseph F. Pickens on March 26, at am. My search for information on the thickness of the veil led me here. Many thanks to all who have contributed to this informative and enlightening discussion.
By: bgoodnough on March 29, at pm. Thanks a lot for the great explanation of the thickness of the veil in the temple. It gives me a new view on the miracle which took place in the temple.
Thanks to all who took time to share their knowledge. By: Daniel Ritchie on April 22, at am. Very interesting comments here. Thanks to all the contributors. You would think their astonishment and awe would be recorded somewhere in all of their commentaries.
After all, the High Priest still had to perform the rituals on the Day of Atonement all by himself for 40 years yet. Josephus records the Jews seeing and hearing many strange things before the destruction of Jerusalem. It seems the priests just kept the torn veil all hush-hush during that whole long period.
As far as yearly curtains being handmade, are there not regulations found in any rabbinic writings as to proper cleaning of the old, and storing of all those extra curtains? How dirty would that curtain get if only used once a year? The silence regarding this issue is quite strange to me. We can read about the meticulous procedures the scribes used for copying manuscripts but nothing about the proper handling of the sacred curtain?
And finally, the significance of the torn veil is always treated as if every gentile was just yearning for the day to come when God would give them access to a relationship with Him. Not one person knew what it meant on the day it happened!
For sure the High Priest was clueless just as millions today are — even after years of preaching about it. Everytime I study any topic from the Bible I end up with dozens of questions but never a definitive answer. Take the baptism of Jesus for instance. You could say He was 1. Men accept what seems right in their mind and reject the rest. That torn veil, though. If I may add another that I had often seen in this, maybe for you ponder on: — 1.
My question is one that i have asked many times but no solid answers were presented. Aniph, although only the high priest could enter the Holy of Holies, perhaps other priests pulled the veil back from the other side without themselves entering.
By: chuckbumgardner on May 27, at am. The veil was draped in a fold so that the High Priest could enter on one side the right and in front of him was still more veil. He had to walk to his left to the end of the veil, turn right through a slit before the Holy of Holies was visible. This prevented anyone else from accidentally peering into the Place he out not. I am in a bible study class and this subject has come up in it. This has been very interesting to read, and I would just like to know the answer to this question.
If the tearing of the veil was to signify a few things, no need for more sacrifices, God coming to dwell with us, etc…. Please know I am new in my walk with Christ, and whatever I read or study I have a tendency to over analyze.
With this being so significant to those who believe, surely this has some significance to them. It also points to the fact that the way to God is now open and thatJesus is the only way the truth and the life.
I trust that you have come that way. It is nice to hear that you are a new beliver. God will speak to you through his word , and you are quite capable of listening to Him so be patient and He will reveal himself to you. Keep going to church , and enjoy Good Christain fellowship. But the Rabbis do not shy from difficult things to explain. This would have been no small thing as these were understood as the famed Nikanor gates that nearly everyone entered the Temple by into the court of the Women.
And we know the Temple was destroyed exactly 40 years after the death of our Lord, the Mesiah in 70 a. So either these two events coincided, which is probable,or the doors have been misinterpreted as the veil, which seems unlikely in light of the comment of Josephus noted by someone here already.
Also regarding the belief that God is Spirit, it is both the belief of Judaism and Christianity that He is exactly that. It is not foreign to Judaism that the Spirit of God inhabits flesh, but perhaps more the reaction to an ill understanding of just how that concept worked itself out in the form of our Lord.
Until He comes. Good question. But I do believe it really happened, regardless of the lack of extrabiblical evidence, simply because Scripture says it did. And the gospels show us that Jesus said a number of things that indicated his equality with the Father see John , e. But how did the Jews explain the torn veil in particular? By: chuckbumgardner on September 30, at pm.
I was involved in the Ashkenazi Messianic Jewish community for 20 years, and I echo and extend what Chuck says. Not just that only two writers of the Bible were gentile Job and Dr Luke , but that many Jewish people today accept that Yeshua Jesus is the Messiah, and that includes accepting that haShem, God the Father, tore the temple veil in two. Although the majority of the Jewish people rejected who Messiah was, this is by no means all Jews.
That does not make them any less part of the Body of Messiah. By: David on October 1, at am. Thanks, David. We see some of this reflected in Scripture in the Pharisees vs. By: chuckbumgardner on October 1, at am. I have searched in so many places and cannot find the answer to this question. Removing it to wash it would leave an open view to the most sacred place.
Please enlighten me and provide me reading sources. What passages are you thinking of when you say that the blood was sprinkled on a daily basis on the veil?
By: chuckbumgardner on October 26, at pm. Leviticus mentions that the priest had to sprinkle the blood on the veil 7 times if the congregation or the priest sinned.
But I am still curious, what happened to this blood- stained veil? I apologize for my misunderstanding. Thank you! By: chuckbumgardner on November 6, at am. Concerning extrabiblical records of the veil. Though not a great fan of Josephus I thought I would check and see what he had to say about this.
We, also, have the singular fact presented that the curtain of the Temple, after being rent at the time of the Passion, was left hanging for a considerable period of time. The Works of Josephus, trans.
Very encouraging to see this discussion. There is value in this on another level. The sages, as noted here, comment on the thickness of the veil for perhaps another reason. The veil serves to shield us from the Presence of Hashem.
It is for our benefit that it existed. We are also told that the chasm separating Sheol from Gan Eden, Paradise, is precisely this distance as well. Yet it is a distance too great to transgress, as Abraham tells the rich man in Sheol. A mere handbreadth separates life from death, flesh from spirit, heaven from hell.
And I will remove My palm and you shall see My back, but My face cannot be seen. Interesting that the moment the Son of God departs this world, the handbreadth is removed. Interesting perspective you bring there to the situation, Chris. Man now had access to the presence of GOD, as mentioned a number of times above , which on earth was the Holiest of Holies behind the veil. GOD no longer needed to be present on earth for priests to bring sin offerings to. Hebrews 16 — Alister, I like this strand of thought and will certainly think about it a bit.
But some immediate concerns emerge. Yes, we do have access to God, but we always did. He entered to offer atonement. We access our Father now on this earth by prayer, they did also. I think the point of no man entering the Holy of Holies rests on the issue of that atonement, the Most Acceptable Sacrifice that the annual offering pointed man toward.
Offerings were not new to the Temple periods. Righteous Abel offered outside of the sacrificial system long before. I like this idea, but having some difficulty with the whole of the thought. He is, as you stated, the Lamb. He is the High Priest. The veil did not prevent access, for a man entered each year.
Perhaps the Cherubim who guard the gates of Gan Eden might. Still, the idea has created something of an itch in the back of my mind. Thank-you for your comments Chris, there is plenty to chew on there. I feel I have made my comments to long in the past, and have given a fairly brief outline to my train of thought above.
It would take me to long to try to answer what you have asked and will look into it more in the future, however I would like to hear your thoughts as to what I try to put across.
Maybe together we might be able to work out something more comprehensible. We are purified by HIS cleansing Blood. The Hebrews had to carry out a ritual sin offering for forgiveness.
As you known in front of it was an enormous Curtain, the Veil. I might add that most of the other religions in those days had a special temple for their god although their gods were made of wood, stone or some earthly construction. After the veil was torn what was behind could be viewed by anyone, usually only the other priests , who might come into the Holy Place, i.
I doubt that any one did go through that gap but the possibility was there. I am sorry that I am inclined to get a bit long-winded, but I hope this helps a little. I will try to follow up on the other things you have mentioned in the future.
I have often wondered how the High Priest was able to enter the Most Holy place by drawing aside the heavy curtail while carrying blood. This would seem that the Holy Place would have then been explosed.
Someone has suggested that the veil somehow overlapped, something like a maise enabling the High Priest to enter without touching it.
If that was so it could account for the suggested differences in the thickness of the veil. Someone on your site suggested that he may have entered at the side which could be a possibility. I would like to hear your take on this and thanks for all the good material. By: Earle Sheffield on November 10, at pm. I think that perhaps years of a dominant gentile doctrine has skewed our thoughts enough that we have difficulty with these things.
None of us escape it, for it has been the lot we received from our forefathers. Connections between what is old and what is new are superficially taught to us and we are generally satisfied with the milk and never crave the meat. Further, we are ignorant of the languages Greek, Aramaic and Hebrew from which these things are founded upon.
We can know these things and are the richer in our faith for them. That is why I said earlier how I appreciate these chats. It is meat. The text is living.
It cannot be divorced from the larger concepts and precepts of the whole of the text. So when we say that we now enter the Holy of holies, we must give the precedent for it. Nothing is new, but rather a perfecting picture of the old.
The old does not disappear either, but is absorbed into the new. So if we are told that we can be confident that we now enter the Holy of Holies by His blood, then we can deduce that the other bloods of the past priests are now of no effect. But this does not negate that they were acceptable previously, because they looked forward in faith to the sacrifice of our Master.
And we know they were acceptable. We could as well deduce just how we will enter by looking at how the priests entered; by virtue of the High priest, but not physically themselves. So how is the text reconciled? The atonement offering was a complete covering for Israel.
If it was accepted by God, then Israel was accepted also, if only until the next Yom Kippur. We know our atonement is once for all time because His offering was acceptable to God in perpetuity.
By that we enter into the Holy of Holies in the Heavenlies, but as I said, access does not change for us or those who preceded us.
Regarding differences, again we must see the picture as being perfected. It is a misconception to say that the Jewish people had to carry out ritual sin offerings for forgiveness. The Yom Kippur sacrifice was the correction for the errors of the previous year. God gave the halacha, the way of walking, but they must perform it in faith. Did not that same God give us a way of walking? Must we perform it to the letter of love to be acceptable to Him?
We strive in the same faith with those who came before us offering sacrifices. We both look for our deliverance from the same Messiah, the same blood.
If the Tabernacle was made visible, we must deduce that God was no longer there or the death toll from those who looked on would not escape the authors of history. No such event is recorded. What is recorded is in the Pauline letters and Acts, where we see that the disciples did not neglect the Temple Worship and further at Shovout, Pentacost, 50 days later the Spirit was poured out from the upper room, generally understood as the upper room of the Temple court.
The breach Hebrew; Peretz is a messianic term but I still struggle with this. I just do not know. Perhaps our God would do us a kindness and open our eyes. Thank-you Chris, As I mentioned before I find your perspective very interesting. I merely seek it as an honour to you. Please forgive me if this inappropriate! Yes, knowledge of the Greek, Aramaic and Hebrew give a great depth of meaning, as does also knowledge of the Jewish culture in those days.
They are things I would like to more about them. I fully agree with you concerning your paragraph concerning the living text. G Yes the act of sacrifice and the blood of sin offerings of an innocent third party was given by and acceptable to GOD. And so the story goes on through other sacrifices throughout the Bible. Looking forward to seeing your further comments.
I am a nurse and have no difficulty moving through curtains with my hands full, using my elbows to move the curtains aside. Elaine, The passing through the veil was not as base as you might suppose. But regarding the disposal of things connected to the Holy, it would be buried, as is the veil of the Torah is to this day. Regarding two curtains, do you mean why were there two?
Or why were they made each year? Alister, Here are two sources which might help us in this. Here are two more articles that may throw some light on these perplexing passages about the Torn Veil:. This article covers the connection between the Baptism of Jesus at the beginning of His ministry and the Cross at the end of His ministry and how the curtain, which was weaved to display a panorama of the heavens, is a metaphor for some spiritual truths. I would wonder if there is not a chiasm inserted within those heavenly tearings as well.
There is a deeper connection underlying this also. I wonder…. He says the temple veil taken down each Day of Atonement was burned. Leslie also states in page , that the High Priest used his elbows to open the veil and gain entrance to the Most Holy Place in the Day of Atonement. Thanks for all the superb work helping in defining the who, what, when, where, and how to all this. Everyone elses comments were helpful as well.
By: Mark Bell on February 13, at am. Hi Chris, if you are still there. I was looking through my commentaries and came across the words Yom Kippur. Am I right in saying they mean Atonement or the Day of Atonement? Hi Alister, Yes. Yom is day in Hebrew. Kippur is atonement.
It is the holiest day of the Hebrew calendar. It is the pinnacle of the fall feasts. Although Yom Kippur is the holiest day of the Jewish year, it is not the holiest day of the Jewish calendar, that would be Shabbat. Shabbat the Sabbath from Friday sundown to Saturday sundown is considered as first amongst all holy days. Another way to describe it is the holiest yom kadosh gadol, or high holiday. I forget which Jewish Sage stressed this, but the reasoning is that this was a holy day holiday specifically written by the finger of haShem God.
David, You are right, my brother. I stand corrected indeed, for it is Shabbat that stands apart among the days. Thank you. I think i will remain silent today. Until Shilo comes. Hi Chris, Sorry this is so late. I hope you are you will still be around for future conversations. I value your input and knowledge and wisdom, and the perspectives we have had in the past. As I mentioned earlier I am especially interested in finding more of the culture s at the time of Christ, the connections between the Old and New Testaments and the language where it pertains to these.
The smaller details of the language do not concern me. I have checked up on Yom Kipper. Wikipedia calls it the Sabbath of Sabbaths. What interests me is that while the people were fervently praying for forgiveness and atonement.
I will be hosting a congregational Passover Seder on the 17th, and this is one of the explanations I will give. My concern has not been with the veils thickness than on wha followed after it got torn-was it retained or removed? Concerning extra biblical records of the veil. Until then I remain somewhat skeptical of him and his writings.
Knowing the difficulty of understanding ancient Hebrew and Greek through the culture of the western mindset it puzzles me that the width or breadth mentions is always assumed to be across the palm. My first impression when I read this is not across the palm but what we would call the depth of the hand. This would make the thickness closer to an inch or less.
As an experienced quilter and embroiderer I can understand the one inch thickness much more than four inches. There are several reasons for this. One is simply the size of the needle being pushed through that much material.
The text does not refer to quilting but to embroidery. In order for the weight of the veil not to tear on its own the linen may have been quilted but wool was often used as a filler. Scripture says not to use animal and plant fibers in the same garment so I doubt they would have quilted with wool filler. I have no basis other than my knowledge of needlework but my guess is that they used a linen woven from rather thick strands of flax thread.
This would have been a sturdy fabric which could then be embroidered as specified. My thinking is they covered the linen base with the background color with fine stitches to hide the roughness of the weave. This would add more to the thickness, especially since they most likely covered both sides of the fabric.
Then the embroidered elements would be stitched on. They might have layered these also and done both sides of the veil so the back was like the front. The thread would also be a thick weave.
Embroidery floss today is what I would call thick thread. Go and see some at a shop. Modern floss can be divided into different strands. The thicker the strand the more each strand covers in one stitch. Each stitch would make the fabric thicker and denser. It makes sense from a sewing point of view. By: Sophie Dawson on April 8, at pm. Thank you for your insights and respectful manner of interaction. I have been as blessed by the tone as the content. Good point Joel. I, too, believe there is a connection between Caiaphas rending his garments when Jesus confirms He is the Son of God in the trial of the Sanhedrin and the rending of the temple veil.
Pilate did not want to kill Jesus rend his garment, so to speak. They decided instead to cast lots for it, much like Pilate did when he passed off the responsibility of the crucifixion to the Jewish crowd by offering to free Him. This is a sinful act, yet distinctly different than that of the Jews, who killed Jesus. God the Father rent his clothes veil as a testimony of his mourning, anger, and disgust at the rejection of His Son.
We no longer need to be ashamed like Adam and Eve. We have fellowship with Him and our bodies are now sufficient housing for the Holy Spirit, the new temple. No sacrificies any more. By: Brock on October 21, at am. I love one dimensional thinking! And here is the proof…. In Matthew, Jesus breaths his last dies and then the veil is torn followed by an earth quake which Mark agrees with.
However, Luke tells us that the sun was darkened, the veil was torn and then Jesus died. By this, if we truly believe that all Scripture is perfect and divinely inspired we can conclude that the following took place: the sun was darkened, the first veil was torn, Jesus then breaths his last and dies.
Then the second veil is then torn which is followed by an earthquake. In this view, the Holy Spirit has the order perfect and correct! This was also separated from the outer part by a veil. In this there was nothing at all. It was inaccessible and inviolable, and not to be seen by any and was called the Holy of Holies. My conclusion is that the second temple had nothing in the Holy of Holies behind the curtain, the Ark having been stolen or destroyed at the Babilonian invasion and burning of the Solomonic temple.
The implications are fascinating in that the priests were then protecting a Godless temple, an empty religion devoid of His presence. I believe this to be the case, but do not want to make this kind of statement without foundation — other than circumstantial. During the first century B. As glorious and elaborate as the Temple was, its most important room contained almost no furniture at all. Unfortunately, the tablets disappeared when the Babylonians destroyed the Temple and, therefore, during the Second Temple era the Holy of Holies was reduced to small, entirely bare room.
By: Franco Guerri on September 19, at pm. The article is available online here. Note Gurtner addresses the thickness of the veil on p.
By: chuckbumgardner on September 19, at pm. Was there a passageway in the middle of the curtain so that the high priest could enter? And if this is the way that the high priest entered, is it possible that there was a curtain that was in front of that open space? By: atlockhart on December 3, at pm. Good stuff … I used it here. By: Jim Peet on September 17, at pm. Ryrie has responded to your question and indicates that he is unable to find the quote directly attributed to Josephus.
There are secondary resources that repeat the statement, but no citation accompanies these documents. A correction will be made in the notes in subsequent printings of the NASB. Supply: cbumgardner. I next had to establish what style to […]. Mathew mentioned graves were opened and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, my question is how can we know that those arose are only saints?
From Ogueri. It was as […]. By: Good Friday indeed the daysman on March 25, at pm. By: Contemplating the Curtain - JulieVarner.
I have been following the comments about the thickness of the veil in the Temple which was torn in two from top to bottom when the Lord Jesus Christ was crucified with great interest for quite some time. A few minutes ago reading Hebrews 6, came to vs 17 — I believe that the veil in the temple which was torn is actually a type of the Lord — His flesh was torn when He was horrifically beaten, the crown of thorns imbedded into His head and then crucified.
The Holy of Holies is open! By: Contemplating the Curtain on April 7, at pm. I was wondering of the composition of the material that the veil was made of. Many biblical references contain symbolic, as well as, practical reason. By: wnettles on May 28, at pm. Seems like a few things are being overlooked.
As others point out the veil represented sin not Jesus. He did not separate people from God. His mission was accomplished successfully.
That resulted in the symbol of sin the veil being rent from perfection God to the imperfect mankind. Every army has reconiscrnce especially during turmoil such as the events of passion week. Somebody saw and reported the event. If not a Roman soldier directly then very shortly after. He would have verified for sure because the event opening up the Holy of Holy implied seeing inside.
Jesus Christ was the promise the covenant with people, the core of the power of the ark. This truth is further manifested by the reality that the same virgin and Jesus are together during His passion and death — the perfect offering of Jesus. Many dull people want to separate Jesus from His mother but such thinking fails historical facts and a deep tradition and a profound theology that God — not men realized and Jesus perfectly lived out.
Just returned from a trip to Israel. Was watching a movie, Saint Paul, which has a scene of the veil as a flowing, light weight, even transparent curtain. So, I wanted to do some research on this — was pleased to find your work on it. Thanks so much!
Fascinating reading! Many thanks to you Chuck and to all who have contributed to the thread with such passion, interest, grace, wisdom and abundant knowledge! I have come to this having read Mark 15 today and been particularly struck by the reference to the Temple veil in verse In a passage that otherwise seems to focus on events happening in the immediate vicinity of the cross, including who was there, what was said and activity from bystanders, that verse stood out to me as different.
I have long understood that the veil of the Temple in Jerusalem was literally torn assunder as Jesus died and that the image of the torn curtain is a help in accepting that through Jesus, the one perfect sacrifice made for all, we have access to the very presence of God.
Today I am thinking I have more to learn about, pray and ponder upon. Presumably there was no going back for the Temple curtain; it had effectively been destroyed and rendered unusable. Perhaps as Mark wrote his Gospel years later and reflected on the events of the crucifixion he recognised by accident or design that a reference to the veil in direct connection with Jesus death might help to squash some of the rumours about whether Jesus had really died or not.
All conjecture on my part I know, but it helps me to bring some immediacy to ancient texts sometimes! Before, He would not even hear us, not to mention allow us to approach Him. The veil was not a small curtain like you see in some movies.
The veil was so massive and heavy that it took priests to manipulate it. An important point here is that no one could simply tear the veil themselves. It would take more than human strength to tear it. The analogy is that it took the mighty hand of God Himself to tear it supernaturally and this tearing, which represents the removal of the separation of God and man, could not be done by humans.
No one can remove our separation from God but God Himself Isaiah The fact that the veil was torn from the top down, some 60 feet from the floor where humans could not reach it , shows that God was the One that caused the veil to be torn. He is the initiator of the veil being rent. He is the cause of the tearing. He, in Jesus Christ, is the reason it was torn. It is no coincidence that the temple sacrifices by Jewish Christians ceased that year and for the years to follow.
The Book of Hebrews was written specifically to Jewish Christians but the applications for us are the same. Hebrews chapter 10 reveals that no other sacrifices where given, at least by the Jewish Christians. Our sins no longer separate us from Him. Today, for those who put their trust in Jesus, we have access to God. This is one of the chief purposes for the writing of the Book of Hebrews and makes the perfect conclusion of why the veil was torn and why it was torn from the top down.
Because of this oath, Jesus has become the guarantor of a better covenant. Now there have been many of those priests, since death prevented them from continuing in office; but because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood. Therefore he is able to save completely those who come to God through him, because he always lives to intercede for them.
Such a high priest truly meets our need—one who is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens. Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself. All rights reserved worldwide. Jack Wellman is a father and grandfather and a Christian author, freelance writer, and Prison Minister.
Graduate work at Moody Bible Institute. Read them in the archive below. If you like what you're reading, you can get free daily updates through the RSS feed here. Thanks for stopping by! I recently found this site a week ago when I was searching for more in indepth understanding about the story of Job.
Specifically, how did Job get through his pain. Unlike Job, I am responsible for my circumstances. Under great psychological and emotional stress…. Your message about the torn curtain and the resulting communion between us and God is wonderful.
It is helping me to feel that there is hope I can care truly for others…and in doing so, myself. There has been too much self centeredness and defensiveness in this life of mine. I can write this down, here…and profess it. But, I need desperately to incorporate it into every thought and action I have. Please, please say a little prayer for this, for me. I need it so badly. Thank You. Thank you Mr. I will be honored to pray for you sir. I can see that the Holy Spirit has been and is working in your life for God grants repentance and He is working in your life obviously for no man confesses Christ and the need for Him as their Savior unless the Holy Spirit is in him or her.
Thank you for this beautiful write-up appropriate not only for general education but also for the spiritual growth of Christians. May the good Lord continue to use you and your medium in promoting and spreading the Good News. Glory to Jesus. Thank you so kindly sir. When I wrote this and did some research I was more amazed at just how much God has done thru His Son to remove the separation between me, a sinful creature, and the holy, divine, and perfect God.
Is there any mention, outside of the Bible, of this event taking place? Do Jewish scholars deny that the curtain was torn? An event this significant surely could not have escaped the notice of the priests and temple worshippers of the time.
Thank you Jocelyn. Great question. The Jews of Judea were practically eradicated by the Romans less than years later. Almost everything that we knew of the Sadducees and Pharisees prior to the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls came from the passing mention of their beliefs found in the gospels.
In other words, very, very little in the way of contemporary records has survived from that time and place so you will not find a great deal of historical evidence for this but there is at least some. Today we have evidence of his existence both by historians and by archeological finds of his remains.
There is extra-biblical evidence for this event also. I am sure there is more than this but the fact that the Bible declares it as so is ultimately enough for me for the Bible is true and we can believe every word of it. I hope this helps Jocelyn. The sources are Tacitus Hist. Yoma 43c; Yoma 39b. Thank you for your most helpful response to my question. Hello Jack, This a great article, something that I think all believers should understand.
Especially with the Easter season fast approaching, it is great to meditate upon how blessed we are to have direct access to God through Jesus our Savior. Well done brother. Your articles have been an inspiration to so many and your knowledge of the Bible continually blesses our readers and me.
So happy to be co-laboring with you brother. The messenger is nothing! The message is everything. Hello, Pastor Jack! Thanks for explaining so simply, even this dense skull can comprehend! Infection around catheter, used for home dialysis. Always in Christ, Jesus….
I can see the strong work of the Holy Spirit in you for you have such a hunger for the Word of God and that is fruit that bears your being saved…not that I had doubts but few Christians today seem to want to study the Bible and this seems wrong. So my compliments on that.
But those who are considered worthy of taking part in the age to come and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. Make sense? My compliments. God bless you, Thomas! Patty Schneider.
Thank You so much Patricia. Such a great kindness. I came back to Mr. Wellmans message this afternoon because I was feeling alone and so unworthy. Your message has helped lift some of the weight off my heart. I feel like we just had a conversation between two friends. I agree totally with Mr. I need soooo much help when trying to better understand many scriptures. I will pray for Your Husband and Your Family.
Thank You dearly. Thanks so much for your quick reply, Pastor Jack! Being hearing-impaired, I DID miss out of many things. Continuing from above…for some reason, my hitting a wrong key, most likely, reply got posted before I could finish. Hi, Pastor Jack! Changed the online bible study to the New English Version. I understood your explanation completely!
Thank you again, Pastor Jack! Going to reply to Thomas Bowers above. Hello, Thomas! Your reply was sweet. As for friends, I choose ones who accept me as I am.
Update on the Building of the Third Temple | Jewish Voice Ministries International
On the ninth and 10th of the month of Av in the year 70, the Roman legions in Jerusalem smashed through the fortress tower of Antonia into the Holy Temple and set it afire. In the blackened remains of the sanctuary lay more than the ruins of the great Jewish revolt for political independence. To many Jews, it appeared that Judaism itself was shattered beyond repair. Out of approximately four to five million Jews in the world, over a million died in that abortive war for independence.
Many died of starvation, others by fire and crucifixion. The destruction was preceded by events so devastating that they read like scenes out of the Holocaust. Hear the words of the ancient Jewish historian, Josephus :. For the ground was nowhere visible for the dead bodies that lay on it. Nor was any regard paid by relatives for those who were still alive. Nor was any care taken for the burial of those who were dead.
The reason was that everyone despaired about himself. The exhaustion from all-out sacrifice of lives and fighting in vain was in itself debilitating, but the religious crisis was even worse. This cast doubt on the very relationship of the people and their Lord. Had God rejected the covenant with Israel? The Temple was central to Jewish religious life in a way that is hard to recapture today. Many Jews believed that sin itself could be overcome only by bringing a sin offering in the Temple.
Without such forgiveness, the sinner was condemned to alienation from God, which is equivalent to estrangement from valid existence. But the channel of sacrifice was now cut off. For many Jews, the whole experience of Judaism was sacramental. The Priests served; the ignorant masses watched; their religious lives were illuminated only by those extraordinary moments when multitudes gathered in Jerusalem. For these people, after the destruction there was only emptiness.
The majority of the Jews refused to quit. One element in this community reacted with overwhelming despair. They rejected any possibility of normal life and chose not to marry or have children. Simple human activities—having a child, getting married, doing acts of kindness in a community—are sustained only by enormous levels of faith and life affirmation, and trust in ultimate meaning.
Considering the tragedy and the threat that still hung over the Jewish community, these people felt they simply could not go on with life as usual. Yet by refusing to live normally, they harnessed despair into a force for action: to make an all-out effort to restore the Temple. Only rebuilding the sanctuary could reduce the terrible angst and restore life to normal. The two major remaining sects, the Pharisees and the Sadducees, shared a common conviction that the Temple must be rebuilt, although the Sadducees, who included the court nobility and priests, were particularly unable to envision Judaism without a Temple.
This consensus drove people to drastic action. In the years to C. In C. But again, the overwhelming might of Rome was brought to bear. Bar Kochba and his troops were destroyed, and the remaining population of Judea was deported. With this defeat, hopes for an immediate restoration of the Temple were set back indefinitely. Comprised of the Mishnah and the Gemara, it contains the opinions of thousands of rabbis from different periods in Jewish history. Yom Kippur.
Tisha B'Av, the saddest day on the Jewish calendar, is testament to the failure of prayer to avert national catastrophe. Tisha B'Av. This famous psalm is read on the eve of Tisha B'Av and sets the tone for an emotionally challenging holiday.